Chapter 16 - My interview

It will be seen that the ‘charges’ have been reduced to one, but it still makes no sense.  What ‘behaviour’?  Which actions?  It will be noted that there are no breaches of policy mentioned.

The ‘document’ provided, given that the previously-notified charges had been breaches of policy, was a long list of breaches of its own policy by the WSR plc.  That will form Chapter 17.

I am first taken to task for something someone else said, of which I had no knowledge…

The proof of the bailey report is in the eating.  Its 4 years on now and no move by the WSR plc to change to the charitable structure.

The ‘Reds under the beds’ analysis continues with our dropping our nominations in time…

‘Independent’ investigator Ashton uses words like ‘attack’.

Once again, I am being questioned / held responsible for the actions of others, such as ‘J’’s threats of legal action when the Trust breached his GDPR rights, although Ashton says in terms ‘I don’t question that you helped Chris Austin out of a hole’.

The ‘not get on’ stuff is despicable.  Ashton suggested that included Mike Sherwood and Geoff Garfield.  You have read their account and can form your view.

Paul Whitehouse’s contributions are interesting.

Robin Moira White

18th July 2024